![]() |
Disclaimer Advertise on this site Contact Us About Us |
|
|||||||
| Banking Stocks First Bank, Union Bank, GTB, Zenith Bank etc |
| Welcome to the StockMarketNigeria.com Forums. | ||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
It was announced today that United Bank For Africa (UBA) was placed on technical suspension at N37.99 following their application for Hybrid Offer.
At What price do you think it will be a good buy? How much do you think the Right Issue and the Public offer will be? Let's think of this as we await the final announcement. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
So is that why they had been manipulating their share price to force it to =N= 37.99? eell if they are not selling at =N= 30.00, then I am not buying.
|
|
|||
|
UBA TODAY ANNOUNCED THAT IT WOULD BE RAISING N54 BILLION VIA A COMBINED OFFER FOR SUBSCRIPTION AND RIGHTS ISSUE OF 1,551,000,000 ORDINARY SHARES OF N0.50 EACH. THE OFFER IF FULLY SUBSCRIBED WOULD INCREASE THE BANK'S SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS TO N102 BILLION. THE BANKS IS SEEKING TO RAISE N14,402,400,000 BY WAY OF RIGHTS AND N39,459,000,000 FROM THE OPEN MARKET.
THE RIGHTS ISSUE OF 1 FOR 20 IS BEING OFFERED AT N34 PER SHARE WHILE THE PUBLIC OFFER IS BEING OFFERED AT N35 PER SHARE Is it really a Good buy??? ![]() @edosag, you are too much your prediction was so close to the announcement!!! Last edited by ghm : 26th February 2007 at 10:49 AM. |
|
|||
|
Considering the recent performance of the bank and its outlook, I believe this is a great strategic buy. What I intend to do is to balance it out with the Oceanic Int'l Bank offer of N16.50. i.e. for every 4 Oceanic shares, I'll pick up just 1 UBA share. The strategy is that of the fastest growing pitted against the "heaviest" in the banking sector.
My own "hybrid" purchase strategy... |
| Sponsored links |
|
|||
|
My own concern is the % discount. It's only 8% whereas Oceanic is 16%, Diamond bank is more than 20%, Intercontinental and Zenith banks last year were 16% & 13% respectively.
|
|
|||
|
My other question will be what do you think UBA market price would have been at this time if not for the technical suspension? In view of the recent decline in banks stock price,UBA would probably be around N35 now in the market. Making this offer a no discount offer.
|
|
|||
|
Hope this helps someone.
Deleted due to copyright infringement. - EIC Last edited by EIC : 3rd April 2007 at 06:33 AM. Reason: Deleted due to copyright infringement. |
|
|||
|
Where is the price heading? January Review:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
In addition to what Stockbear published on this offer; these are additional information
1. Online Offer UBA launches the first ever online public offer. here is the link http://www.ubaoffer.com/ 2. Prospectus You can also find the prospectus in this link http://www.ubaoffer.com/UBAProspectus.pdf. I have gone through the prospectus and taking time to make my decisions. |
|
|||
|
I may be wrong, but I seriously doubt that this offer will be fully subscribed at this obscene price (in the Nigerian context of the Banking landscape). At least not with the Oceanic Offer in play at the same time.
I don't doubt that the stock has a great potential for long-term appreciation but the offer price is a sticking point at this time. Those more enlightened amongst us should please correct my ignorance. Thanks. |
|
|||
|
CTSL considers UBA a long-term buy, which to me means don't expect capital appreciation in the short term. What do you think?
This is a short version. File too large for uploading Analysis and Recommendation Capital Adequacy The paid-up share capital of UBA increased by 130.72% to N3.53billion in September 2006 from N1.53billion in March 2005. The increase in the share capital came from the allotment of 4billion Ordinary Shares of 50kobo each to the shareholders of former STB in line with their scheme of merger. The shareholders fund (which includes revaluation of fixed assets reserves) increased by 167.46% to N41.67billion in 2006, well above the minimum capital requirement of N25billion for Nigerian banks. Total assets also jumped up by 253.06% to N884.14billion. Its total assets and contingent liabilities stood at N1, 051billion in 2006 making it the biggest bank in Nigeria. Earnings assets grew by 248.40% to N850.95billion in 2006 from N244.22billion in 2005 while Fixed Asset leaped up by 437.42% to N33.19billion in 2006. The proportion of shareholders’ funds to total assets dropped to 4.71% in 2006 from 6.22% as a result of higher proportionate growth in all the balance sheet items (with the exception of loan and advances) than equity growth. Equity to total loan and advances increased to 37.91% in 2006 from 23.04% in 2005 as a result of less proportionate growth in the loan and advances than the equity growth. However, the proportion of equity that is tied down in non- income earning assets increased to 79.66% in 2006 from 39.64% in 2005. Assets Quality Gross loans and advances increased by 70.85% to N119.74billion in 2006 from N70.09billion in 2005 while total classified loans increased more proportionally by 523.76% to N15.10bilion in 2006 from N2.42billion in 2005. Therefore the proportion of classified loans to total loans increased to 12.61% in 2006 from 3.45% in 2005. At 12.61%, the non-performing loan to total loans is above the industry average of 10%. Should the non-performing loans turn bad, 36.23% of the shareholders fund will be reduced as against 15.53% in 2005. However, 65.23% of the non-performing loans was provided for in 2006. Profitability Gross earnings grew by 246.69% to N90.45billion in 2006 from N26.09billion in 2005. Interest income grew by 299.09% to N57.69billion in 2006 from N14.47billion in 2005 while non-interest income increased by 181.56% to N32.75billion in 2006 from N11.63billion in 2005. It is worth mentioning that the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) in gross earnings, interest income and non-interest income between 2002 and 2006 was 41.56%, 40.12% and 44.30% respectively. Interest income as a proportion of gross earnings stood at 63.79% in 2006 up from 55.41% in 2005 while the non- interest income as a proportion of gross earnings stood at 36.21% in 2006 down from 44.59% in 2005. Growth in interest expenses outpaced the growth in interest income both between the two most recent years and in the last five years. Interest expenses rose by 672.32% to N26.95billion in 2006 from N3.49billion in 2005 leading to a CAGR of 51.94% between 2002 and 2006. Consequently, net interest income increased by 180.31% to N30.74billion in 2006 from N10.97billion in 2005 while the CAGR in interest income only stood at 32.72% between 2002 and 2006. Return on capital employed (core capital) declined to 36.29% in 2006 from 39.51% in 2005, return on equity maintained the same trend to 22.50% in 2006 from 29.25% in 2005, though still higher than the industry average which is about 20%. Return on total assets also declined to 1.39% in 2006 from 2.46% in 2005, this is below the industry average of 2.9%. The decline recorded in the returns on assets, equity and core capital was attributable to the expanded capital base of the bank which put pressure on earnings. Management Efficiency Operating expenses increased by 178.75% to N41.79billion in 2006 from N14.99billion in 2005 and recorded a CAGR of 36.60% between 2002 and 2006. Staff cost which stood at N17.48billion in 2006 up from N6.84billion in 2005 accounted for 41.83% of the operating expenses in 2006 down from 45.63% in 2005. A more proportionate growth in the major expense items than the income between 2005 and 2006 led to declining pre- tax and post-tax profit margins. Pre-tax profit margins declined from 24% in 2005 to 12% in 2006 while post-tax profit margin declined from 17% in 2005 to 10% in 2006. Despite the growth of 155.50% and 23.03% in staff cost and number of employees respectively between the two years, the contribution of each employee to the pre-tax profit increased to N2.28billion in 2006 from N1.63million in 2005 while staff cost accounted for 19.33% of the gross income down from 26.22% in 2005. Liquidity The bank’s deposit liabilities of N776.14billion are made up of 34% in demand deposit, 28% in tenored deposit, 12% in savings account and 27% in domiciliary account. The high cost funds (tenored) to the bank is 28% of its total deposit liabilities as against the industry average of 31% while the low cost funds to the banks is 72% of it total deposit liabilities as against the industry average of 69%. As a result of the mix of deposit liabilities, the bank cost of funds which stood at 3.47% is lower than the industry average of 4%. The bank maintained a healthy liquidity position as the ratio of cash and bank balances to total deposit liabilities stood at 55.99% up from 47.06% in 2005 and well above the 40% minimum requirement of bank in Nigeria. We note that in computing the liquidity ratio for banks, CBN allows banks to include treasury bills holding and 1-3- year FGN Bonds. If we have added these instruments to the cash and bank balances of UBA, it would have achieved a higher liquidity position. The proportion of total deposits that was channeled into loans and advances reduced to 14.16% in 2006 from 32.96% in 2005. In a similar development, the proportion of total assets that was channeled to loans and advances in 2006 reduced to 12.43% from 27.00% in 2005. The declining net-interest margin in the banking industry as a result of stiff competition may have been responsible for this development as bank now develop other fees-based and commission generating income. Investment Analysis Investment in UBA over the years has proved to be a worthwhile investment, in terms of capital appreciation, cash and scrip dividends payment. An investment of N100,000 in UBA stock on January 03, 2000 is worth N1,550,060.53 if the dividends accrued to the investment have not been invested in an interest bearing assets or N1,660,750.97 if the dividends have been investment in an interest bearing asset of 7.00% per annum. Our analysis shows the 1 unit of UBA stock traded at N8.60 on January 03, 2000. If the cost of transaction is deducted from the principal, the amount would have purchased 11,155 units of UBA shares in 2000, which as at the date of this report stood at 40,961 units as a result of scrip dividend. The accumulated total dividend earned less 10% withholding tax stood at N93,354 if not invested. If the dividend had been investment in an interest bearing assets at a 7% compounded interest rate, it would have grown to N107,645. The value of the investment based on the market price of N37.99 is N1,650,060.53 or N1,663,750.97 with a total profit of N1,550,060,53 or N1,563,750.97, thus returning 1,550% or 1,564% over the period. Therefore, an investment of N100,000 has translated to a CAGR of 59.78% between 2000 and 2006. Forecast Based on the PAT forecast of N16.53bn, N22.67bn and N28.37bn for the period ending 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively and applying appropriate discounting rate and earnings multiple, our fair value for UBA is N40.16 per Ordinary Share of 50kobo each. The stock is currently trading at N37.99 on the floors of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) therefore the Offer price of N35.00 is at 8.54% discount to the market price and 14.74% discount to our fair value. We therefore assign the stock a LONG-TERM BUY at the current Offer Price. Research Team: Ayodele Akinwunmi Peju Adelakun E-mail: research1@counterstrust.com research2@counterstrust.com |
| Sponsored links |
|
|||
|
I am sure this analysis makes a lot more sense to those who are use to financial presentations based on Nigeria accounting standards or those familiar with that industry in general.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I am sure as our market continue to develop information on companies will continue to increase and easily accessible to investors. Most of the ratios, comparison, and analytical facts does not ring a bell especially when one uses the US market as a frame of reference. But then, it could be due to lack of familiarity with financial presentation by banks in general. By the way, this is an interesting forum. Happy Investing. |
|
|||
|
Since the UBA PO roadshow began I have often wondered how well subscribed the offer will be. The general consensus seems to be that the PO is overpriced. If so, how does this affect the outcome of the offer? Do we as the public/investors call the shots? Do we determine the value placed on stock or do the board of directors/shareholder call the shots, telling us what to pay for their stock? This clear consensus seems to be shared by stockbrokers alike. If this holds true as being reported, both in the news and in stockbrokers' market review, it seems UBA's offer stands little chance of success! Is their anyone in the house intending to or has bought into the offer? Yes or no, please share your reasons why you intend to buy or not buy the offer. Quote:
|